Case File · SPARK-LIT-01 · Interdisciplinary Literacy Design Status: Delivered

Executive Case Study — Curriculum & Program Leadership

SPARK Literacy Initiative

Drama as the vehicle for comprehension — not decoration.

For the South Carolina Governor's School, I designed a standards-aligned third-grade literacy unit that uses drama — tableau, readers theatre, role-play, and process drama — as the means of teaching comprehension, vocabulary, and close reading of picture books. The deliberate design choice: integrate the arts so the art form carries the academic objective, and package it so any classroom teacher could deliver it without a theatre background.

My RoleCurriculum Designer & Facilitator
ClientSC Governor's School
TypeInterdisciplinary Curriculum
Grade BandThird Grade
GovernanceOASIS™ Framework

Initiative Snapshot

Single-phase curriculum design & facilitation engagement

Gr 3Target grade band
ELA + TheatreDual standards mapped
7Areas of work scoped
7Curriculum deliverables produced
4Stakeholder groups aligned
OASIS™Governance framework

The Most Significant Design Decision

Rather than use drama to decorate literacy lessons, I made it the vehicle that carries comprehension — so rigor and creativity became inseparable.

That single principle governed every lesson, rubric, and facilitation guide that followed. It turned comprehension into something students perform and make visible — and kept the unit accountable to ELA rigor instead of drifting into performance for its own sake.

The Business Case

The problem wasn't engagement alone. It was making comprehension visible.

Third-grade literacy is too often a solitary, worksheet-driven task — leaving striving readers disengaged and giving teachers few ways to see how students actually understand a text. Drama offered a way in, but integrating it carelessly creates its own risks.

  • Striving readers disengage from solitary, worksheet-based comprehension work
  • Teachers have few ways to make a student's understanding visible
  • Drama bolted on as enrichment competes with ELA time and dilutes rigor
  • Arts integration done carelessly becomes decoration, not instruction
  • A unit that assumes theatre expertise can't scale to ordinary classrooms

The opportunity: design so the art form carries the academic objective.

A standards-aligned unit in which dramatic conventions become the means of teaching comprehension, vocabulary, and close reading — fully mapped to ELA standards and deliverable by any classroom teacher. Drama serves the comprehension goal through deliberate, repeatable routines:

  • Tableau to make meaning and inference visible
  • Readers theatre for fluency and close reading
  • Role-play and hot-seating for character and perspective
  • Process drama to build vocabulary in context
  • Performance-based tasks as evidence of understanding

What the Design Had to Serve

Comprehension

Make understanding observable through interpretive, embodied tasks.

Vocabulary

Build academic vocabulary in context, not from isolated lists.

Engagement

Re-engage striving readers through active, interpretive reading.

Standards Alignment

Hold every lesson accountable to ELA and theatre standards.

Teacher Enablement

Deliverable by any teacher — no theatre background required.

Approach — OASIS™ Applied

How I designed the unit, phase by phase.

O

Observe

Find where students disengage from text.

Analyzed third-grade ELA standards alongside theatre standards and pinpointed where students disengaged from reading — mapping the comprehension skills drama is uniquely positioned to develop.

A

Align

Make drama serve the comprehension goal.

Partnered with theatre educators and ELA teachers to agree on shared learning targets, so drama served the comprehension goals rather than competing with them for instructional time.

S

Strategize

Sequence toward a culminating performance.

Designed a gradual-release instructional sequence that embedded theatre vocabulary and dramatic conventions into close reading, each lesson building toward a culminating performance task.

I

Implement

Build it so any teacher can deliver it.

Built the full unit — modeled routines (tableau, readers theatre, hot-seating), student activities, rubrics, extensions, and differentiation — packaged so any classroom teacher could deliver it.

S

Sustain

Leave reusable, standards-tagged resources.

Produced reusable, standards-tagged curriculum resources and facilitation guides so the unit could be re-taught and adapted across classrooms and future cohorts.

Major Decisions Made

Four decisions that shaped the design.

This section is not about activities — it is about judgment. Each decision is paired with the tradeoff it managed: what would have happened if I had chosen differently.

What I Produced

The deliverables — built to be re-taught, not just taught once.

A complete, standards-tagged package designed so the unit outlives the engagement and travels to any third-grade classroom.

Standards-Aligned Curriculum Unit

A full third-grade unit dual-mapped to ELA and theatre standards.

Drama-Based Lesson Sequences

Gradual-release lessons embedding tableau, readers theatre, and process drama.

Curated Picture-Book Text Set

Texts selected for close reading and dramatic interpretation.

Teacher Facilitation Guides

Modeled routines and scripts so non-theatre teachers can lead with confidence.

Performance-Based Assessment Rubrics

Rubrics that read comprehension from what students perform.

Vocabulary & Comprehension Routines

Repeatable routines that build academic vocabulary in context.

Dual standards mapping (ELA + theatre)Picture-book text selectionDrama-based lesson sequencesVocabulary & comprehension routinesPerformance-based assessmentTeacher facilitation guidesDifferentiation & scaffolding

Outcomes & Impact

What the design accomplished.

Success was measured not by how much drama filled the room, but by how clearly the design made comprehension visible — and how far the resources could travel.

Comprehension Made Visible

Reframed comprehension as something students perform and make visible, not just answer on a worksheet.

Engagement & Vocabulary

Deepened engagement and academic vocabulary through embodied, interpretive reading.

A Repeatable Model

Gave teachers a repeatable model for arts-integrated literacy they could adopt and adapt.

Scalable Resources

Created scalable, standards-tagged resources usable well beyond the original classroom.

Curriculum DesignInterdisciplinary IntegrationInstructional DesignAssessment DesignStakeholder CollaborationFacilitation

Lessons Learned & Leadership Evolution

What the work taught me.

01

Rigor and creativity aren't a trade-off.

Designed well, the dramatic task is the comprehension work — engagement and academic rigor reinforce each other instead of competing.

The shift: from "add drama for engagement" to "design drama to carry the objective."

02

Deliverability is a design constraint.

A unit that needs a specialist can't scale. Facilitation guides aren't an afterthought — they're part of the curriculum.

The shift: design for the ordinary classroom, not the confident few.

03

Make thinking visible.

Performance surfaces understanding that worksheets hide — especially for the disengaged readers the unit was built to reach.

The shift: assess what students can show, not just what they can circle.

The one principle I would not change

Arts integration works only when the art form carries the academic objective rather than decorating it — the design has to make rigor and creativity inseparable.

The OASIS™ Mindset

"I solve systems, not symptoms."

A disengaged reader isn't a motivation problem to patch — it's a signal about the system producing the outcome. The OASIS™ Framework is how that instinct becomes repeatable: a way of thinking, leading, and solving that endures beyond any single project.

O

Observe

Understand before acting — current state, root causes, constraints.

A

Align

Create shared understanding and genuine commitment.

S

Strategize

Develop intentional solutions grounded in evidence.

I

Implement

Execute with transparency, adaptability, and accountability.

S

Sustain

Build systems that endure beyond implementation.

What stakeholders can expect: I create clarity where there is uncertainty, alignment where priorities conflict, and structure where complexity grows. I communicate honestly, decide intentionally, and favor long-term value over short-term activity.

The most meaningful contributions I make are rarely individual deliverables. They are the systems, structures, and standards that keep creating value long after a project ends.

Innovation educators can actually implement.

SPARK reflects how I lead: reframe the problem, align the people, and build governed systems that last. Let's turn your complexity into clarity.